Comments on: Updated: Proposition 8 Passes http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/ Political Commentary from a Progressive Perspective Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:27 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Yesterday’s Elections « Deanna’s Ramblings http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/#comment-2395 Yesterday’s Elections « Deanna’s Ramblings Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:46:31 +0000 http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/?p=847#comment-2395 [...] as I was disgusted by the proponents of Yes on 8 (the no same-sex marriage crowd), I am similarly disgusted by the [...] [...] as I was disgusted by the proponents of Yes on 8 (the no same-sex marriage crowd), I am similarly disgusted by the [...]

]]> By: deannaizme http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/#comment-1106 deannaizme Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:34:26 +0000 http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/?p=847#comment-1106 Sensico, it's an open question right now. The courts will have to decide. Sensico, it’s an open question right now. The courts will have to decide.

]]> By: zhx.home - Man’s Law, God’s Law, Coleslaw » Blog Archive » The Law of Conservation of Stupidity http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/#comment-1105 zhx.home - Man’s Law, God’s Law, Coleslaw » Blog Archive » The Law of Conservation of Stupidity Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:52:33 +0000 http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/?p=847#comment-1105 [...] you Jim Domen/J.D. Gaddis of Yorba Linda/Amanda Stanfield of Monrovia. I’m not the only one that noticed, [...] [...] you Jim Domen/J.D. Gaddis of Yorba Linda/Amanda Stanfield of Monrovia. I’m not the only one that noticed, [...]

]]> By: sensico http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/#comment-1104 sensico Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:20:09 +0000 http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/?p=847#comment-1104 I think maybe "legal union" would be the same as "civil unions". I think civil unions should probably be the first step. I really dont care about marriages. They are just shows. Plus civil unions would be better because you get the same rights as straight couples. I think as long as you love the person your with, it shouldn't even matter if you married, you dont have to be married to be with the one you love. I have a gay friend whos been with his man for 10 years, since high school, they dont feel the need to get married. But, if straight couple can get married so should gay couples. I was wondering...I heard Ellen got married when if first passes in California, so does that marriage hold or does their marriage license get taken away??? I think maybe “legal union” would be the same as “civil unions”. I think civil unions should probably be the first step. I really dont care about marriages. They are just shows. Plus civil unions would be better because you get the same rights as straight couples. I think as long as you love the person your with, it shouldn’t even matter if you married, you dont have to be married to be with the one you love.
I have a gay friend whos been with his man for 10 years, since high school, they dont feel the need to get married. But, if straight couple can get married so should gay couples.
I was wondering…I heard Ellen got married when if first passes in California, so does that marriage hold or does their marriage license get taken away???

]]> By: watercooler http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/proposition-8-passes/#comment-1103 watercooler Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:50:07 +0000 http://deannaizme.wordpress.com/?p=847#comment-1103 I don't really understand why gay people think that the definition of marriage should be changed to allow them to use it? If so many gay people are demanding so many rights, new anti-discrimination laws, etc, then why not one more? Why not request a legal definition that is more suited to the homosexual community? Some type of legal union. It's not marriage. I don’t really understand why gay people think that the definition of marriage should be changed to allow them to use it?

If so many gay people are demanding so many rights, new anti-discrimination laws, etc, then why not one more? Why not request a legal definition that is more suited to the homosexual community? Some type of legal union. It’s not marriage.

]]>